In the case of Sieber v. Rose, the United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit, upheld the Bankruptcy Court’s determination that a Debtor’s failure to list an exempt property barred that Debtor from claiming those exemptions later. This decision the Court reached was that Debtor had acted in bad faith to conceal the assets of the estate and hinder administration by the credits. However, it is quite possible that the Debtor would have been able to fully exempt some, if not all, of these assets if he had been properly represented. It is imperative that a prospective Bankruptcy Debtor work with an attorney in listing and exempting his property and disclosing his income and expenses. Otherwise, filing a bankruptcy case can be comparable to playing Russian Roulette with bullets in the chamber.
We Get to Know Our Clients.
- Home
- »
- Bankruptcy
- »
- Sieber v. Rose
Sieber v. Rose
On Behalf of Wampler & Souder, LLC | Mar 6, 2013 | Bankruptcy |
Categories
- Auto Accidents (38)
- Bankruptcy (22)
- Child Custody (20)
- Construction Law (36)
- Criminal Law (8)
- Divorce (62)
- Estate Planning (7)
- Family Law (19)
- Firm News (1)
- High-asset Divorce (7)
- Injuries (2)
- News (4)
- Personal Injury (33)
Archives
Recent Posts
- What are some red flags that may indicate an upcoming divorce?
- Common mistakes to avoid in a child custody dispute in Maryland
- Personality changes may come after a brain injury
- 4 tips for accepting that your marriage has ended
- What is the best interest standard applied in child custody cases in Maryland?