Spouse can be Responsible for Paying for Child Whom She is not Allowed to Visit With?

Conover v. Conover is a recently decided case by the Court of Special Appeals involving a lesbian couple. In that case, a spouse, who was neither the biological nor adoptive parent, of a child conceived (through artificial insemination), before the marriage, was determined to have no parental rights, including even visitation rights with the Child. This, despite the fact that the estranged couple were involved in a romantic relationship when the child was conceived and the child and the biological mother addressed the non-biological spouse as the father. The majority opinion stated "...a person seeking visitation who is not a biological or adoptive parent is a third party," and "marriage in and of itself alone does not confer parental status to contest child access opposed by a biological parent."

In a concurring opinion Judge Douglas Nazarian claimed that, under the current law, a spouse could potentially have no right to visit with the same child that he or she would be obligated to support financially.

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information
Email Us For A Response

How Can We Help You

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information
disclaimer.

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.

close

Privacy Policy

Frederick Office
170 West Patrick Street
Frederick, Maryland 21701

Phone: 301-668-5111
Fax: 301-668-2770
Frederick Law Office Map

Silver Spring Office
12114B Heritage Park Circle
Silver Spring, Maryland 20906

Phone: 240-833-2284
Fax: 301-942-8296
Silver Spring Law Office Map

Upper Marlboro Office
14452 Old Mill Road
Suite #301
Upper Marlboro, Maryland 20772

Phone: 301-736-5432
Upper Marlboro Law Office Map