We are essential, and so are you! Our firm is still OPEN for business and accepting new clients. To protect your safety in response to the threats of COVID-19, we are offering new and current clients the ability to meet with us via telephone or through video conferencing.Please call our office at 301-732-7675 to discuss your options.

Silver Spring: 240-833-2284
Frederick: 301-668-5111
Upper Marlboro: 301-736-5432

Experienced. Trustworthy. Driven.

  1. Home
  2.  » 
  3. Divorce
  4.  » Spouse can be Responsible for Paying for Child Whom She is not Allowed to Visit With?

Spouse can be Responsible for Paying for Child Whom She is not Allowed to Visit With?

| Sep 11, 2015 | Divorce |

Conover v. Conover is a recently decided case by the Court of Special Appeals involving a lesbian couple. In that case, a spouse, who was neither the biological nor adoptive parent, of a child conceived (through artificial insemination), before the marriage, was determined to have no parental rights, including even visitation rights with the Child. This, despite the fact that the estranged couple were involved in a romantic relationship when the child was conceived and the child and the biological mother addressed the non-biological spouse as the father. The majority opinion stated “…a person seeking visitation who is not a biological or adoptive parent is a third party,” and “marriage in and of itself alone does not confer parental status to contest child access opposed by a biological parent.”

In a concurring opinion Judge Douglas Nazarian claimed that, under the current law, a spouse could potentially have no right to visit with the same child that he or she would be obligated to support financially.

Archives

FindLaw Network